Hildebrandt joins the Citizen Debate on AI and law (16 March 2021)

During the Belgian Artificial Intelligence week (15-19 March 2021), Mireille Hildebrandt will present the European perspective on AI, law and the future of AI regulation. She will be joined by Prof. Catherine Régis who will bring in the Canadian perspective and Prof. Gregory Lewkowicz who will moderate the debate.

The Citizen Debate Artificial Intelligence & Law, Perspectives from Europe and Canada takes place on Tuesday 16 March at 20.00-21.30. Fore more information and registration, click here.

Discussion

More news

Post-Project Output: The Special Issue on ‘THE FUTURE OF COMPUTATIONAL LAW’

 28 May 2024 ▪

For the second CRCL Conference (CRCL23) in Brussels we invited a small number of key authors in the domain of computational ‘law’ to present their position on the future of code- and data-driven legal technologies. Their salient papers provide a research agenda for further development and integration of these technologies, including keen attention to the education and training of lawyers and computer scientists, the impact on access to justice, Rule of Law checks and balances, the need for targeted instead of general ‘solutions’ and an analysis of what the integration of AI in legal practice can and cannot achieve. The papers, by thought leaders across the spectrum of both law and computer science, have now been published in the Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Research in Computational Law, in this special issue.

... »

Hildebrandt publishes chapter on ‘Grounding Computational Law’ in legal education and professional legal training

 18 Dec 2023 ▪

COHUBICOL’ s Mireille Hildebrandt has contributed a chapter in the recently published Research Handbook on Law and Technology (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023). The chapter, entitled ‘Grounding computational ‘law’ in legal education and professional legal training’, discusses how we can devise learning objectives and teaching approaches that contribute to critical engagement with computational legal technologies and calls for effective scrutiny of such technology in legal research and practice.  

... »