Hildebrandt to chat with Richard Buckland on technologies and law (16 March 2021)

Mireille Hildebrandt will have a ‘fireside’ chat with computer scientist Richard Buckland of University New South Wales (UNSW) in Sydney on why law matters for computer science education and research.

The event is part of the UNSW Centre for Ideas’ new series of international conversations that brings the best of the world to Sydney. Each conversation pairs a leading UNSW thinker together with their international peer, mentor or hero to explore inspiration, new ideas and discoveries.

Please note that ‘fireside’ in Sydney is breakfast in Europe (9-10AM CET). For more information and registration, click here.

To (re)watch the talk, click here.

Discussion

More news

Post-Project Output: The Special Issue on ‘THE FUTURE OF COMPUTATIONAL LAW’

 28 May 2024 ▪

For the second CRCL Conference (CRCL23) in Brussels we invited a small number of key authors in the domain of computational ‘law’ to present their position on the future of code- and data-driven legal technologies. Their salient papers provide a research agenda for further development and integration of these technologies, including keen attention to the education and training of lawyers and computer scientists, the impact on access to justice, Rule of Law checks and balances, the need for targeted instead of general ‘solutions’ and an analysis of what the integration of AI in legal practice can and cannot achieve. The papers, by thought leaders across the spectrum of both law and computer science, have now been published in the Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Research in Computational Law, in this special issue.

... »

Hildebrandt publishes chapter on ‘Grounding Computational Law’ in legal education and professional legal training

 18 Dec 2023 ▪

COHUBICOL’ s Mireille Hildebrandt has contributed a chapter in the recently published Research Handbook on Law and Technology (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023). The chapter, entitled ‘Grounding computational ‘law’ in legal education and professional legal training’, discusses how we can devise learning objectives and teaching approaches that contribute to critical engagement with computational legal technologies and calls for effective scrutiny of such technology in legal research and practice.  

... »