Hildebrandt to keynote at three major CS conferences this fall

This Fall, Mireille Hildebrandt will be keynoting at three major computer science conferences: ACM-RecSys2019 in Copenhagen, ACM-Multimedia2019 in Nice and ECSS2019 in Rome.

The slides of the ACM-RecSys2019 are now available: Opening Keynote, Rude Awakenings from Behaviourists Dreams. GDPR and the Methodological Integrity and the GDPR.

The slides of the ACM-Multimedia 2019 are now available: EU Data Protection Law: An Ally For Scientific Integrity?

The slides of the ECSS2019 are now available: Speaking Law to Computers Scientists and Other Folk.

Discussion

More news

Post-Project Output: The Special Issue on ‘THE FUTURE OF COMPUTATIONAL LAW’

 28 May 2024 ▪

For the second CRCL Conference (CRCL23) in Brussels we invited a small number of key authors in the domain of computational ‘law’ to present their position on the future of code- and data-driven legal technologies. Their salient papers provide a research agenda for further development and integration of these technologies, including keen attention to the education and training of lawyers and computer scientists, the impact on access to justice, Rule of Law checks and balances, the need for targeted instead of general ‘solutions’ and an analysis of what the integration of AI in legal practice can and cannot achieve. The papers, by thought leaders across the spectrum of both law and computer science, have now been published in the Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Research in Computational Law, in this special issue.

... »

Hildebrandt publishes chapter on ‘Grounding Computational Law’ in legal education and professional legal training

 18 Dec 2023 ▪

COHUBICOL’ s Mireille Hildebrandt has contributed a chapter in the recently published Research Handbook on Law and Technology (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023). The chapter, entitled ‘Grounding computational ‘law’ in legal education and professional legal training’, discusses how we can devise learning objectives and teaching approaches that contribute to critical engagement with computational legal technologies and calls for effective scrutiny of such technology in legal research and practice.  

... »